Benfits of Teaching Backwards






While educators grapple with the centuries old challenge of aiding student learning, new research brings to light the potential benefits of flipping the order of classroom instruction, challenging the traditional teaching model of presenting a lecture first, followed by a lab.

Assistant professor Dr. Kasee Smith conducted a study published in the Journal of Agricultural Education examining how matching teaching approaches with student learning styles enhances educational gains.

Smith’s research is rooted in experiential learning theory, which recognizes two approaches in grasping knowledge. According to the theory, some people’s learning generally improves with abstract conceptualization, or by thinking through concepts and crafting theories based on observations. This learning style is provided with lectures and readings. Others learn more efficiently through immersion in concrete experience, a hands-on approach to learning directed by tangible activities and exercises.

Traditional science education focuses on abstract conceptualization, with many instructors presenting lectures first. But Smith wondered if this approach accommodates the learning style of only a specific set of students. With 12 years of experience as a high school teacher, she was curious to test the educational outcomes of educators using what is referred to as the “backwards” approach, by exposing students to the lab first, and then a lecture.

“As a teacher, I noticed a distinct trend in units where I started with concrete experience first.”
She found when students were taught with an initial focus on group activities, they walked away with a firm and dynamic comprehension of the material.

“At the time, although I didn’t know why having a tangible experience contributed to a better understanding of the material, but I knew it was important.”

Smith’s research tracked 121 high school students throughout two units on different science topics. The only variance of the lessons was the order of the material presented, with one unit taught in a lecture format first, while the other implemented an activity first. Students were administered both a pre and post test to gauge learning gains relative to their identified preferred learning style.

Students consistently tested higher on units accommodating their preferred learning style. Notably, 80 percent of the students preferred learning style was concrete experience first, the opposite of traditional science teaching models.

Smith is preparing to replicate this study in Idaho and also adjust lessons to different levels of curriculum. If the findings hold consistent, she plans to extend her research into other disciplines such as math.

Smith’s research carries impactful opportunities for the teaching profession.

 “I think the data was incredibly exciting,” she said. “It shows how a shift in teaching style can yield massively positive benefits for students.”

  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CALS Ireland Study Abroad 2018

From Dublin to Dairies CALS students and faculty toured one of Ireland's agriculture research centers We were at the foot of a castle. Perched on a tall hill, impenetrable walls enclosed a millenium old round tower, cathedral, and chapel. The exposed rock of the castle was mottled and weathered, splotched with white lichen and hardy moss. After a stormy day, swirls of heavy clouds shed curtains of windblown mist across the landscape. Wind and rain lashed around us, but the castle remained still, unmoving, as if part of the earth itself.   “For those who are not faint-hearted” Dr. Ahmadzadeh called, “There is a striking view on the other side.” He pointed to a narrow, water bogged trail weaving around the sharply slanted hill. The ground had withstood hours of pouring rain, and was now saturated and unstable, shifting precariously under our feet. Undaunted, all eight students quickly fell in step behind him. We treaded through the long grass, stepping o...
Read more

Writing Toolbox

Using a Readability Scale  How easy-to-read is your writing? Whether you are designing a lesson plan or penning an article, communicating the complexity of agriculture can be challenging. One way to note the “readability” of a document is by using the Flesh Kincaid Readability Test, which is available through Microsoft Word. The scale assesses the reading ease of your document and indicates the appropriate grade level to read the paper. It takes into account sentence structure, syllables, word length, and vocabulary. With this in mind, as the author you can more accurately tailor your work to best suit the age of your audience. To access the readability statistics, go to Tools, Spelling & Grammar, 1 Click the File tab, and then click Options . 2 Click Proofing . 3 Under When correcting spelling and grammar in Word, make sure the Check grammar with spelling check box is selected. 4 Select Show readability statistics . Once the spell...
Read more

Student Spotlight: Sydney Anderson

Sydney Anderson is a senior studying ASCL in Twin Falls. Growing up in Nampa, Anderson was involved in agriculture in various ways. Her parents enrolled her in 4-H after getting a horse for her older sister and her to share; she continued to do 4-H for 12 years. Anderson got involved in the National FFA Organization because of her grandfather, who was President of the North Miami Chapter in Florida at the time. Her passion for leadership, serving others, and advocating for agriculture grew from then on.  “I chose to study ASCL because of the luxury of distance learning while having the ability to experience all the possible opportunities in the Magic Valley,” Anderson says. She believes that teaching individuals about agriculture and the impact it has on the world is extremely important. Anderson loves public speaking and coordinating events, so studying ASCL has helped her continue to learn about and keep an interest in a future career relating to these passions.  Anderson se...
Read more